Mars-the-red-planet-appears-pinkish-red-covered-with-grayish-swaths-as-seen-by-Hubble-Telescope

When Science Is the Hero

A good friend, who is an analytical chemist, just read Andy Weir’s debut novel The Martian—and raves about the compelling story, meticulous detail, and accuracy. Without these fundamental elements of quality science fiction, he would have quit reading upon encountering a flaw. Now he’s pumped to catch the movie.

Here’s a one-sentence summary (in case you live on another planet and missed the cinema hoopla): an astronaut, stranded on Mars for more than four years, can survive only by relying on science and ingenuity. As Meghna Sachdev notes in Science magazine, “The story’s real heartthrob is, well, science. Between the technologies showcased on the Mars mission and its breathtaking Hermes spacecraft, the astronaut’s ingenious solutions for staying alive on a deserted planet, and the creativity of scientists back on Earth, the story reads like a love letter to science—and a surprisingly plausible one at that.”

Sachdev delivers an eye-opening interview with the brains behind this box-office phenomenon: Andy Weir, director Ridley Scott, and Jim Green, NASA’s director of planetary science and an adviser on the film. Science geeks are in fashion. Nitpicking realism (e.g., space suits, the Mars Ascent Vehicle, habitats, physics) renders movie magic, even plot points. (Caroline Framke, Vox‘s Culture columnist, nicely amplifies five scientific twists in The Martian.)

It’s refreshing to hear science is cool—for the moment—to the general public. I grew up in the decade of the intense space race. Eight years after President John F. Kennedy challenged Americans’ spirit of adventure, two US astronauts walked on the Moon. An estimated 600 million TV viewers—including every kid and parent in my small world—watched the lunar landing on July 20, 1969.

The Pew Research Center recently released the report “A Look at What the Public Knows and Does Not Know about Science,” which features an interactive quiz. It points out that the developments in science and technology raise issues for public debate (e.g., space exploration, climate change, genetically modified crops). Nonetheless, another 2015 Pew Research report says that 84 percent of members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science view US K–12 education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics as  “average” or “below average” when compared to that of other industrialized countries.

Science often becomes a political football. However, it is not a Republican or Democratic issue. Rather, it is an essential ingredient in our education and evolution as a society. It’s on us to dig into information so we can listen to a range of views from the perspectives of government, business, academia, and research. The media do not always present information following strict standards of science journalism. It’s on us to demand better. As Steven G. Mehta observed earlier this year in Business Insider, “But in fact, science is messy. It starts with a hypothesis, a theory about the way something works. One scientist finds evidence that seems to prove or disprove that idea. Others pile on, testing it, modifying it, and sometimes disproving it.”

My parents did not pursue careers as scientists, but their education was grounded in the sciences. Mom studied botany, and Dad focused on a pre-med curriculum. They were comfortable with the facts of science and their leap of faith in God. Yes, they graduated in the old-school period—1949. Nevertheless, I cannot fathom their acceptance of politicians who sidestep a science-related policy question by answering, “I’m not a scientist,” with the implication “therefore, I do not need to answer.”

In the late summer of 1969—under a starry, starry sky far from city lights—my dad and I lay on the floating dock just steps from our lake house. With our backs against the warm, graying boards, the rock of the current and the squeak of Styrofoam floats lulled as we gazed upward at our tiny patch of a nearly 14-billion-year-old universe.

“Not many miracles get bigger than that,” Dad said, sweeping his hand against the vast night. Then he fell silent to the water’s gentle lap.

6 Comments

  1. Karen Albright Lin

    Few other endeavors are as important as science in learning about ourselves, our context, our capability of innovating, and our ability to cooperate with other countries. Science (and especially universe exploration) is our human unifier.

  2. T.K. Thorne

    Loved this, Catherine! The Martian was a great book and a well done movie. The Universe is an extraordinary place and we live in an amazing time. Just read about a scientist duplicating visual input into the brain using a camera pixels as stimulations on a blind person’s tongue. The eyes don’t “see”; the brain does.

  3. Bea dM

    as you say “It’s refreshing to hear science is cool…”. As Karen says, countries do collaborate where science is concerned – NASA, CERN etc. and that might be the only hope for humanity surviving in the long run. One of the blogs I follow is “gringaofthebarrio.wordpress.com”: the blog was great on in-depth modern American history issues, and for the last couple of months has been posting fascinating information on NASA research projects…

Thanks for dropping by. I welcome your comments!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s